Politics is a result of balancing two or more interest groups, so there's no truth can be found in politics. Yeah, that's right, yet we all are influenced from various sides at the beginning, which is just an inevitable thing.
We both are raised up in different environments. You are Briton, and I am Japanese. English is your native tongue but not mine, when I was able to handle with only my native tongue and after I learned how to read and write this universal tongue, my 'truth' has been completely different from one another.
I mean there's no general truth that penetrates my entire life. I myself have repeatedly experienced in my entire life a Copernican change or other revolutionary ones, or just a paradigm shift before and after I had religion.
We tend to evaluate almost everything from our consistency in ourselves-whether something is for or agaist our 'nature of the nature' but in the first place is there any 'nature of the nature' and is it really based on purified form of reality? In you it is singular and I am hardly imagine how reality exists in singularity since I believe there are many 'truth' according as how we were raised up, how we acquired the notion of generally acceptable common knowledge.
I believe in the first place it's irrational not to say absurd for us to position ourselves in 'neutral', since we all are biased, then my conclusion-we are in the first place 'biased' so by adopting many different sources, we can mend our biased viewpoint.
Nature of the nature is something that we can't be achievable, so it is my standpoint that we can only be achievable relative truth by accepting as many sources as possible. We cannot purify the core of nature of the nature, but can make more round sphere by acceptance, adoption, that even leads to tolerance to others and other's viewpoint. It is more preferable than the core which is something unattainable.
